[Talk-us] [Talk-us-newyork] Highway classification guidelines for New York State

[Clifford Snow]

On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:18 AM Eric Patrick <txemt1 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>  There's a multifaceted problem here. We're trying to please everyone,
> which won't happen, but by not doing something, we're still not pleasing
> everyone. There has to be some give and take between all of the uses for
> OSM. Changing PA to a trunk may work for vehicle routing purposes, but it
> may not work for bicycle routing purposes.
>
>  Why should this particular functional classification
>> system enjoy prominent placement in the highway=* key while another,
>> perhaps better suited system should go untagged?
>
>
> Is there a better suited system?
>

Perhaps a tagging system specifically for both cycleways and roads that
allow bikes that would provide the functionality for bicycle routing.

-- 
@osm_washington
www.snowandsnow.us
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20210928/58358b91/attachment.htm>