[Talk-us] Announcing progress: Minnesota Highway classification project publishes first guidance

[Paul Johnson]

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 8:44 AM Bob Gambrel <rjgambrel at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think we are near the end of this talk-us thread. Both Evin and Paul
> have provided input along the way and I have responded as well. A few
> others added insight as well. As a result of this there is a newly opened
> discussion the the Slack #local-minnesota channel addressing this issue.
> Evin has initiated the discussion there. Other active
> highway-classification mappers are joining that discussion. Others who have
> joined this talk-us discussion are on Slack and are aware of the
> #local-minnesota channel so can participate as they see fit in that
> discussion.
>
> Paul: I want to make sure your views are discussed there. If you want to
> join that discussion please do. If not can you summarize your bottom line
> opinions about what the wiki says now that you disagree with. You can
> provide them here or within the wiki discussion page. I am asking this now
> because it is possible that your views have changed since the beginning of
> the thread. If you post your views here I will transcribe them to Slack so
> the others can know what they are.
>

I think I already covered it.  Only significant concern being the motorway
part.  Barring some truly exceptional edge cases, I don't think we should
be hinting to consumers to expect a freeway heading into an at-grade
intersection, particularly when such a situation is something I think
everyone would expect to happen on an expressway.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20220128/022af807/attachment.htm>