[Openstreetmap] Re: OSM License and debian

[SteveC]

* @ 22/05/05 02:08:54 PM pere at hungry.com wrote:
> 
> [Jon Stockill]
> > The DFSG doesn't have a particularly fantastic record when applied
> > to documentation and data - they decided the RFCs were non free
> > after all.
> 
> What is your definition of free documentation?  One that can be shared
> without cost?  Or one where the user can modify it and publish the
> modified version?  I believe the Debian definition require the latter.

Is debians dislike of CC universal, or are they happy with
attribution-sharealike, or what?

have fun,

SteveC steve at fractalus.com http://www.fractalus.com/steve/