[Openstreetmap] Re: OSM's future.

[topro at gmx.de]

yes, you are right. sounds good to me that way. 
 
Tobi 
 
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- 
> Von: "Immanuel Scholz" <immanuel.scholz at gmx.de> 
> An: openstreetmap at vr.ucl.ac.uk 
> Betreff: [Openstreetmap] Re: OSM's future. 
> Datum: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:23:51 +0100 (CET) 
>  
> Hi, 
>  
> > The problem is that if you have to split it by session you need to 
have 
> > the entire database on each of the servers. I would for example not 
mind 
> > having the database for Denmark on my server, however I _would_ mind 
> > having to have 1TB (or whatever it takes to have images, GPS data, 
> roads, 
> > etc) of data for the entire world. 
>  
> I think, what he means is, that you can host all requests for denmark, 
but 
> do not "own" denmark. You have to get your data from a central server 
> (hosting the world) and are obligated to transfer changes the user made 
to 
> the server (or maybe forward all changing requests at all). 
>  
> This way, Denmark can be accessed very quickly, without server bandwith 
> used but without the need to host the whole world on every local 
server. 
>  
> Think caches, not servers. ;-) 
>  
>  
> (This reminds me of DNS.. Someone already tried to setup a dns cache 
for 
> WMS tiles? *g*) 
>  
> Ciao, Imi. 
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
> Openstreetmap mailing list 
> Openstreetmap at vr.ucl.ac.uk 
> http://bat.vr.ucl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstreetmap 
>  
 

-- 
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner