[OSM-talk] Cycleway

[Frédéric Bonifas]

2006/7/21, Etienne <80n80n at gmail.com>:
> waterways and aeroways do not have a highway tag, so I don't think that
> cycleway *needs* a highway tag.

So do I

> Is this cycleway tag intended to be used in combination with a highway tag
> where a road comprises of a vehicular lane and a cycle lane perhaps?

Yes that was what I meant but it can also be used alone if the
cycleway don't share its way with another road.

> Is it better to have a way with two tags (highway=secondary, cycleway=lane)
> or to have a two ways; one for the highway and one for the cycleway?
>
> Some examples might make it clearer how these tags are intended to be used.

I will try to find some CC-BY-SA pictures of cycleways to give some
examples on the wiki.

> Etienne

Fred