[OSM-talk] Re: One way streets
Simon Hewison
simon at zymurgy.org
Tue May 16 22:06:21 BST 2006
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> I'm tempted to agree with Oliver. The danger of having 'one way'
> dependent on the direction of the segment is that, if a segment is
> accidentally reversed, the data becomes wrong. Having 'oneway=NE', or
> whatever, is independent of this.
I've already written this "backwards segment" reporting utility, and if
I run it regularly, then it would be reasonably easy to identify
segments that have become accidentally flipped around the wrong way.
Oh, I have written this reporting utility, and it's already found quite
a few. I'll wikify the results from the latest planet.osm in a readable
form tomorrow for people to see what the findings are. Then people can
make an informed decision as to whether or not it's a good idea.
At the moment, it runs against planet.osm, which means it's monthly, but
it's easy enough at present to look at all ways in the database (minus
the TIGER import) and check them (because there's not an enormous
numbers of ways), so it could run more often, providing I don't hammer
the api too badly.
--
Simon Hewison
More information about the talk
mailing list