[OSM-talk] Slippy Map update

[Nick Whitelegg]

Hello Steve,

* @ 23/11/06 10:10:25 AM Nick.Whitelegg at solent.ac.uk wrote:
>> Another point regarding rendering... how are updates to the mapnik.xml
>> (was that its name?) style file going to be integrated with the 
rendering
>> process? I added some extra stuff for unsurfaced tracks, cycleways, 
woods
>> and hills the other day.

>Yes, sorry, it's diverted a little from svn. If I add the current xml to
>svn would you mind merging them favouring the scales etc in the one I'm
>about to add as artem tweaked a lot of stuff.

OK fine will do, it'll probably be either this evening or tomorrow now.

There is one possible issue. Some of the stuff I added was for 
natural=wood and natural=heath. From my (limited) understanding of the 
format, though, I think we may need to create another PostGIS table if we 
want to show areas with the 'natural' tag, because in one of the Python 
scripts there seems to be some SQL to create tables for 'landuse', 
'amenity' and various other things, which are supported by the current XML 
file. Am I correct?

Nick