[OSM-talk] Slippy Map update

SteveC steve at asklater.com
Thu Nov 23 12:03:54 GMT 2006


* @ 23/11/06 12:02:59 PM Nick.Whitelegg at solent.ac.uk wrote:
> Hello Steve,
> 
> * @ 23/11/06 10:10:25 AM Nick.Whitelegg at solent.ac.uk wrote:
> >> Another point regarding rendering... how are updates to the mapnik.xml
> >> (was that its name?) style file going to be integrated with the 
> rendering
> >> process? I added some extra stuff for unsurfaced tracks, cycleways, 
> woods
> >> and hills the other day.
> 
> >Yes, sorry, it's diverted a little from svn. If I add the current xml to
> >svn would you mind merging them favouring the scales etc in the one I'm
> >about to add as artem tweaked a lot of stuff.
> 
> OK fine will do, it'll probably be either this evening or tomorrow now.
> 
> There is one possible issue. Some of the stuff I added was for 
> natural=wood and natural=heath. From my (limited) understanding of the 
> format, though, I think we may need to create another PostGIS table if we 
> want to show areas with the 'natural' tag, because in one of the Python 
> scripts there seems to be some SQL to create tables for 'landuse', 
> 'amenity' and various other things, which are supported by the current XML 
> file. Am I correct?

yes, it just needs a natural entry in osm2pgsql.c at the top like the
others

> 
> Nick
> 
> 

have fun,

SteveC steve at asklater.com http://www.asklater.com/steve/




More information about the talk mailing list