[OSM-talk] Slippy Map update

[Andy Robinson]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of SteveC
>Sent: 23 November 2006 12:04 PM
>To: Nick Whitelegg
>Cc: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Slippy Map update
>
>* @ 23/11/06 12:02:59 PM Nick.Whitelegg at solent.ac.uk wrote:
>> Hello Steve,
>>
>> * @ 23/11/06 10:10:25 AM Nick.Whitelegg at solent.ac.uk wrote:
>> >> Another point regarding rendering... how are updates to the mapnik.xml
>> >> (was that its name?) style file going to be integrated with the
>> rendering
>> >> process? I added some extra stuff for unsurfaced tracks, cycleways,
>> woods
>> >> and hills the other day.
>>
>> >Yes, sorry, it's diverted a little from svn. If I add the current xml to
>> >svn would you mind merging them favouring the scales etc in the one I'm
>> >about to add as artem tweaked a lot of stuff.
>>
>> OK fine will do, it'll probably be either this evening or tomorrow now.
>>
>> There is one possible issue. Some of the stuff I added was for
>> natural=wood and natural=heath. From my (limited) understanding of the
>> format, though, I think we may need to create another PostGIS table if we
>> want to show areas with the 'natural' tag, because in one of the Python
>> scripts there seems to be some SQL to create tables for 'landuse',
>> 'amenity' and various other things, which are supported by the current
>XML
>> file. Am I correct?
>
>yes, it just needs a natural entry in osm2pgsql.c at the top like the
>others

This would get water body's rendered too, i.e. those set as natural=water

Cheers

Andy

>
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>
>have fun,
>
>SteveC steve at asklater.com http://www.asklater.com/steve/
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk