[OSM-talk] osmeditor2 and JOSM

[Christoph Eckert]

Hi,


> That is important to some people, and - I think - the major advantage
> of osmeditor2; With JOSM then being OS Java compatible, the question
> is just one of preferred toolkit - and that can be put aside.
>
> Although I like working with native (gtk/qt) applications under
> linux, I also know that it is better to have one feature-complete
> editor than two editors which work well in their certain areas, but
> lack features.

very true. I always did tend to better stay open source even if it hurts 
more, but this time I noticed that I switched to josm because I simply 
wanted to have a tool which easily did the job. osmeditor also has cool 
features, but I gave up as I tried to create the same street 6 times 
and the only success was that some segments (but not all) have been 
uploaded. That's not a complaint, it's open source and I can (or even 
not :( ) improve it.

So Nick, I'd better like to see osmeditor improving, but if it comes to 
reality, this simply would last to long. Let's go josm; done.


ce