[OSM-talk] open data
Mike Collinson
mike at ayeltd.biz
Thu Sep 21 23:27:07 BST 2006
At 11:28 PM 21/09/2006, Etienne wrote:
>I might be wrong, but I think that the main reason originally for
>using SA was to encourage consumers of the data to contribute their
>modifications and enhancements back to OSM. The idea was that this
>would provide that magical exponential drive for the project.
>
>If we don't get any consumers then there will be no modifications to
>hand back, so we are cutting off our noses to spite our faces.
>
>Its also very obvious now that contributors and consumers are really
>two very different types of user. Most contributors are wizzing
>around the countryside on bicycles with GPS units and cameras - and
>they seem to find this a very enjoyable activity in its own
>right. most consumers of the data are going to be small companies,
>associations, groups and individuals who cannot afford commercial
>map license fees but have no time or interest in making maps
>(there's a gap between contributor and consumer where some people
>might be able to make some money).
>
>Since collecting the data and making the base maps is so much fun
>there is clearly no need to drive OSM by contributions back from
>consumers. Its doing very well without them.
>
>There is also evidence that map publishers faced with a choice
>between using OSM data under the current license and not producing a
>map at all, will alway choose the latter option.
>
>There does not appear to be a good case for continuing to use the SA license.
>
>Etienne
Well said!
As an individual and OSM member, I really enjoy whizzing about on my
bike and will continue contributing no matter how this debate turns
out; I respect the majority.
As the head of a small company, I would be neglecting my duty if I
recommended using OSM in our commercial products with the current
license and lack of clear policy.
So I'd go further and restate the first para above: the
SA discourages consumers of the data from contributing their
modifications and enhancements back to OSM.
Mike
Oz
More information about the talk
mailing list