[OSM-talk] New Forest - thanks, tagging and lost keys

[David Groom]

Nick,
had an enjoyable day yesterday, shame I couldn't do both days.  The keys 
aren't mine.  All my data now uploaded to server and appropriately tagged.

David

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nick Whitelegg" <nick at hogweed.org>
To: <talk at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 11:23 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] New Forest - thanks, tagging and lost keys


>
> Thanks to David, Robert, Jon, Dean, Neville, Steve, Richard and Anna for
> coming to the New Forest weekend and making what was I hope an enjoyable, 
> and
> definitely a successful weekend with probably most of the roads and cycle
> paths, and a good number of new footpaths, successfully mapped.
>
> For those of you who did off-road stuff, for consistency with existing 
> Forest
> data I'd like to suggest the following tagging scheme:
>
> Paths: highway=bridleway; foot=permissive; horse=permissive (all paths 
> unless
> otherwise indicated have permissive bridleway rights).
>
> Narrow paths (if you noticed a path was particularly narrow): as above but
> width=narrow. Maybe not an ideal tag but in an eventual printed or online 
> map
> of the Forest I'd like to distinguish narrow paths for navigation 
> purposes.
>
> Waymarked cycle tracks: highway=unsurfaced; foot=permissive; 
> horse=permissive;
> bicycle=permissive
>
> Gravel tracks with no cycle access: as 'waymarked cycle tracks' but minus 
> the
> bicycle=permissive.
>
> On another note, did anyone at the weekend leave a set of very small
> (padlock?) keys. The tea shop found them when we left.
>
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>