[OSM-talk] Editing and tagging - Potlatch, or just JOSM?

[Barry]

Guys

It was certainly not intended as an accusation and I sincerely apologise to
anyone who took it that way. I have a very bad habit of using !!!!!

I've counted backwards from 10 and I'll leave you to it.

Happy Potlaching



-----Original Message-----
From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Easton
Sent: 17 August 2007 09:52
To: OSM Talk List
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Editing and tagging - Potlatch, or just JOSM?


Hi Barry,

Actually, the way you posed and framed your 'question' does actually look
very much like an accusation. I read it that way.

I thought the response was quite muted and suited the tone of your
'question'.

Let's all take a deep breath, count backwards from 10 and re-read what we
are about to post before pressing return ;)


*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 17/08/2007 at 9:33 AM Barry  wrote:

>You Guys are amazing
>
>> "tracing rivers and other landscape features from the Yahoo! imagery." 
>> - is this not breaking copyright????!!!!
>
>>Why do you think we have Yahoo! imagery in potlatch? Specifically because
>>we've been told that we can use it for deriving map data.
>
>It was a QUESTION - not an ACCUSATION!!!!!!
>

____________________________________________________________
Brent Easton                       
Analyst/Programmer                               
University of Western Sydney                                   
Email: b.easton at uws.edu.au


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk