[OSM-talk] Editing and tagging - Potlatch, or just JOSM?
barry at bettersoftware.co.uk
Fri Aug 17 10:14:23 BST 2007
It was certainly not intended as an accusation and I sincerely apologise to
anyone who took it that way. I have a very bad habit of using !!!!!
I've counted backwards from 10 and I'll leave you to it.
From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Easton
Sent: 17 August 2007 09:52
To: OSM Talk List
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Editing and tagging - Potlatch, or just JOSM?
Actually, the way you posed and framed your 'question' does actually look
very much like an accusation. I read it that way.
I thought the response was quite muted and suited the tone of your
Let's all take a deep breath, count backwards from 10 and re-read what we
are about to post before pressing return ;)
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 17/08/2007 at 9:33 AM Barry wrote:
>You Guys are amazing
>> "tracing rivers and other landscape features from the Yahoo! imagery."
>> - is this not breaking copyright????!!!!
>>Why do you think we have Yahoo! imagery in potlatch? Specifically because
>>we've been told that we can use it for deriving map data.
>It was a QUESTION - not an ACCUSATION!!!!!!
University of Western Sydney
Email: b.easton at uws.edu.au
talk mailing list
talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the talk