[OSM-talk] Featured images for christmas week

[Karl Newman]

On Dec 21, 2007 6:43 PM, Andy Robinson <blackadderajr at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> On 21/12/2007, Karl Newman <siliconfiend at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 21, 2007 10:49 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder)
> > <blackadderajr at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > David James wrote:
> > > >Sent: 21 December 2007 5:48 PM
> > > >To: talk at openstreetmap.org
> > > >Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Featured images for christmas week
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Fri, December 21, 2007 2:30 pm, Andy Robinson \(blackadder\) wrote:
> > > >> If house number rendering gets implemented in time I'll do an image of my
> > > >>  local area that might be considered. I've just started gathering house
> > > >> number and other close-in data.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.55511
> > > >> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.55511&lon=-
> > > >1.81947&zoom=17&layers=0B
> > > >> T>
> > > >> &lon=-1.81947&zoom=17&layers=0BT
> > > >
> > > >I don't know whether to be impressed at the level of detail you've
> > > >gathered, or depressed because of how small it makes my own efforts look
> > > >... :-(
> > >
> > > Well, its my local area and since I started to map it in 2005 it shouldn't
> > > be a surprise that I use it as a bit of a testing area. Some of the earliest
> > > ways (sub 50 ID numbers) lurk in there.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >One question - what's the source for the residential=building data (the
> > > >rectangle-ish areas at the sides of the roads)?
> > > >
> > >
> > > It's a mixture of manual survey and artistic impression. The beginning and
> > > end of each run of houses is easy to do by taking a photo of the boundary
> > > position which when synchronised in JOSM to the GPX track gives you a pretty
> > > accurate location. The setback from the road is guesswork and doesn't yet
> > > sit right with the width of the road at every zoom level. The thickness
> > > again is guesswork and where I'm trying to give an impression rather than
> > > being precise. The same applies to the total run of the building, which in
> > > most cases is actually semi detached or detached housing which should really
> > > be drawn as individual blocks. Maybe in a couple of year's time I'll feel
> > > like going to that extent! for now I'm just making a single continuous run
> > > where there are only residential homes along the run. If something else
> > > interjects I take a photo of it and tag appropriately.
> > >
> > > One the house number rendering works you will see I hope little numbers at
> > > the start and end of each run of building. These are set on nodes within
> > > each building area. I'm also recording the house number opposite a side
> > > junction.
> > >
> > > I would say though that all of this is only really possible if you have
> > > fully mapped out all the roads and other paths and tracks. I was surprised
> > > how easy it is to gather the extra data. Doing it on foot, that's the only
> > > reliable way of ascertaining the house number on each end of a block.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Andy
> >
> > AFAIK, there still isn't an approved way to tag house numbers yet.
> > I've been discussing it on the Wiki. Maybe there is a method for
> > individual buildings, though.
> >
> > Karl
>
> We thrashed out ideas on th wiki the other day and decided upon the following:
>
> The buiding areas are tagged with building=residential (or
> building=whatever if its something else)
>
> The nodes are also tagged with buidling=residential and have an
> additional ref=# on them for the house number.
>
> Will document this in Map Features if it looks to work out ok once rendered.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
> --
> Andy Robinson
>

Okay, that will work for numbering buildings and showing the number on
a map. The argument I'm having on the Wiki is more for house numbering
which can be used for address interpolation along a street. GPS
devices use this sort of numbering (which is my intended application).

Karl