[OSM-talk] [Talk-us] TIGER Map Updates

[Alex S.]

Paul Fox wrote:
> dave wrote:
>  > Yeah, that's the trouble with the TIGER data.  Its coverage is
>  > excellent, but the quality can be worse than what's there.  So, do you
> 
> wow.  i'm beginning to realize that we in new england must be very
> lucky.  sure, tiger shows a lot of non-existent roads, but those
> that are there have always seemed very accurate to me.  i'm sorry
> to hear that the rest of it is so bad.

Outside of the major cities (and I mean *just* outside), the quality of 
the data near me goes down very quickly.