[OSM-talk] License

[Johnny Doe]

--- "Robert (Jamie) Munro" <rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:

> 
> A lot of people thing maps should be public domain,
> others think the
> current licence is too permissive. Either way, we
> can't have the debate
> unless the project is owned by a central entity.
> 

How are you going to deal with the people who will
reject to accept your point of view ?
I will transfer the "copyright" to some random
foundation
only under GNU GPL.
It means that i don't care about being listed anywhere
as a contributor, but the data should stay Free as in
"Free Software" and certainly not PD.



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate 
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367