[OSM-talk] prohibited manoeuvres

A Morris aledmorris2 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 7 21:51:21 GMT 2007


Prohibited manoeuvres can span many nodes though, could your scheme cope
with that?


On 2/7/07, Scott Waye <scott at waye.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I much prefer putting tags on the node:
>
> <node>
>    <no_turn from="seg_id_x" to_seg="seg_id_y">
>
> I have implemented an A* algorithm for osm and I think this would be the
> easiest one to incorporate.  Anything with "left"s, "fourth left", is
> just a pain.
>
> Andy Allan wrote:
>
> >On 2/5/07, A Morris <aledmorris2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>How about this:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >See
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Routing:_turn_restrictions
> >for the non-concluded discussions. As for an example of a more
> >complicated restriction, here's one from where I live:
> >
> >No right turn between 8am-7pm (except buses and cycles) - I should
> >really pop over and grab a photo of it.
> >
> >If you're willing to take this challenge on, my advice would be to
> >gather as many real-life restrictions (i.e. photographs) as possible
> >BEFORE coming up with a solution, otherwise you'll end up bolting on
> >quick fixes as you go along. And be careful, plans have been suggested
> >a number of times to remove segments from OSM at some point.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >talk mailing list
> >talk at openstreetmap.org
> >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20070207/e22e3450/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list