[OSM-talk] Osmarender4 slippy map (preview)
David Earl
david at frankieandshadow.com
Sat Feb 10 16:53:56 GMT 2007
I can remove osmarender:nameDirection for Cambridge once osmarender4 goes
live, but might it not make sense to remove osmarender:nameDirection tags
globally in the database when this happens, rather than do them
individually?
Are any of the icons/areas/names I sent you likely to go into osmarender4?
Any chance you can use the opportunity to switch colours for the long
standing gripe of red/green for trunk/primary?
David
> -----Original Message-----
> From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org
> [mailto:talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org]On Behalf Of Jochen Topf
> Sent: 10 February 2007 16:27
> To: Francisco R. Santos
> Cc: talk at openstreetmap.org; Frederik Ramm
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Osmarender4 slippy map (preview)
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 04:53:13PM +0100, Francisco R. Santos wrote:
> > mmm, look at some streets just left to the Cambrigde airport:
> Rayson Way,
> > Sunnyside, Rawlyn close, Gerard close... JOSM, shows ordered
> segments (some
> > of then are only one segment), and the slippy map shows them
> upside down.
> > May be the "name_direction=-1" tag is causing them to be drawn
> upside down?
>
> That can well be. Because Osmarender4 now renders most street names
> right without the help of the name_direction or osmarender:nameDirection
> tags, those tags now flip the name back in the wrong direction. Just get
> rid of those tags and it should be ok.
>
> Jochen
> --
> Jochen Topf jochen at remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/
> +49-721-388298
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
More information about the talk
mailing list