[OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] ways with 'spurs'

[Barry Crabtree]

On 2/26/07, Simon Hewison <simon at zymurgy.org> wrote:
>
> Barry Crabtree wrote:
> > Contentious? Where is the contention :-) Surely a way would never double
> > back on itself? Isn't it as wrong as a zero length segment? I understand
> > the debate about forked/looped/disjoint ways. I can see how they can be
> > *logically* fine but a complete pain for a rendering engine. In this
> > case we have a way that overlaps itself. I can't see how that can be ok!
>
> A way doubling back on itself, like a roundabout, perhaps?


No, this is different, the way goes from A to B, then back to A! 2 segments.

Baz.


-- 
Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live
forever.  - Gandhi.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20070226/03ff3c52/attachment.html>