[OSM-talk] Server slowness

[Martin Spott]

Nick Hill wrote:

> But to be clear, that 40% speed increase is entirely hypothetical. There is 
> nothing to suggest that on our current hardware, with our database and usage, 
> that an OGC database will be at all faster than our arrangement. Probably much 
> slower.

Just to comply with common language on this list: Do you have the
slightes proof that backs this allegation ?

People are trying to pin me down on performance comparisons of the OSM
model vs. PostGIS. Alleging that "an OGC database" would be much slower
doesn't without having these performance numbers it not entirely wise
in such a context.

Regards,
	Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------