gravitystorm at gmail.com
Mon Jul 9 22:49:03 BST 2007
On 7/9/07, Andy Allan <gravitystorm at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/9/07, David <thewinch at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I thought area=yes was just a generic way of allowing all current
> > linear features to also be areas. The tag is needed because areas are
> > closed ways not a separate data privative. With out the area tag it's
> > not really possible to determine if a closed way tagged with
> > highway=residential is an area or just a circular street.
> It would be a circular street. If it was an area, it would be
> landuse=residential. In general, it's only meta-information (e.g
> source_ref) that can apply to both ways and areas.
Ah, d'oh. Now that I've read the area=yes wiki page, I understand what
you mean. Forget what I said.
More information about the talk