[OSM-talk] no replay-to header at talk
osm.list at randomjunk.co.uk
Wed Jul 11 13:23:10 BST 2007
On 11/07/07, Raphael Studer <studerap at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There's clearly two different ways of expecting the behaviour to work,
> > one of which is technically wrong. But I don't see a technical reason
> > why the "proper" way doesn't work with the software people are using.
> This sounds like "both ways are good, but mine is better".
> Technically wrong, in my eyes, would be if mails don't arive or arives
> two times.
> As long as this don't happens, no way is the better one.
"Technically wrong" as I meant it in this case means ignoring the RFCs.
And munging reply-to can prevent mails being delivered because it
trashes the sender's reply-to. This is kind of the point.
More information about the talk