[OSM-talk] no replay-to header at talk
studerap at gmail.com
Wed Jul 11 13:14:15 BST 2007
> There's clearly two different ways of expecting the behaviour to work,
> one of which is technically wrong. But I don't see a technical reason
> why the "proper" way doesn't work with the software people are using.
This sounds like "both ways are good, but mine is better".
Technically wrong, in my eyes, would be if mails don't arive or arives
As long as this don't happens, no way is the better one.
More information about the talk