[OSM-talk] NCN refs - consistency

Andy Allan gravitystorm at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 09:21:21 BST 2007

On 7/12/07, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/11/07, Peter Miller <peter.miller at itoworld.com> wrote:
> > Sustrans also has regional routes (ncr) but we don't have any in Suffolk to
> > my knowledge. We do have regional routes, for example 'Suffolk Costal
> > Route'. I haven't encoded these but proposed using rcn_ref.
> Can we please *not* invent a new tag for every possible source of
> routes. In the netherlands that are dozens of organisations that make
> cycling routes and we're certainly not proposing adding a new tag for
> each.
> We need something like:
> cycle_route=foo;bar;baz
> bar:ref=A110
> bar:name=Bloemenroute
> baz:ref=A111
> baz:grade=5

Umm, I don't understand. Isn't baz:ref a new tag? How is that any
different from what we're proposing with rcn_ref?



More information about the talk mailing list