[OSM-talk] parking garage
Ulf Lamping
ulf.lamping at web.de
Fri Jul 13 05:31:49 BST 2007
D Tucny schrieb:
> On 13/07/07, *Dirk-Lüder Kreie* <osm-list at deelkar.net
> <mailto:osm-list at deelkar.net>> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stephen Gower schrieb:
> > I agree multistory carparking should be distingushed
> > from open air parking, and agree your suggested rendering "P
> with a
> > ^ over" is good, but I think this should be a new key that varies
> > the existing amenity=parking key, for "backwards compatibility".
> > It should also distinguish single floor but underground parking.
> > We perhaps should also have an indication of the total number of
> > spaces at a location. Any suggestion for key names for these?
>
> amenity=parking
> type=open_air|multistory|underground
> capacity=N
>
> or
>
> amenity=parking
> parking=open_air|multistory|underground
> capacity=N
>
>
> public=yes|true|no|false?
> free=yes|true|no|false?
> operator=text (e.g. NCP/Council/Sainsburys)?
>
As some people don't like underground parking or park garages, we should
render them differently than open air parking areas - as already
mentioned. Are all renderers able to distinguish rendering by these
label combinations? At least mappaint can't do this, but once I got
things going in mappaint development, I'll try to change this.
BTW: parking=singlestory (only one area but "roofed" - anyone with a
better name) is missing?
Regards, ULFL
More information about the talk
mailing list