[OSM-talk] parking garage

D Tucny d at tucny.com
Fri Jul 13 15:54:37 BST 2007


On 13/07/07, Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping at web.de> wrote:
>
> D Tucny schrieb:
> > On 13/07/07, *Dirk-Lüder Kreie* <osm-list at deelkar.net
> > <mailto:osm-list at deelkar.net>> wrote:
> >
> >     -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >     Hash: SHA1
> >
> >     Stephen Gower schrieb:
> >     >           I agree multistory carparking should be distingushed
> >     >   from open air parking, and agree your suggested rendering "P
> >     with a
> >     >   ^ over" is good, but I think this should be a new key that
> varies
> >     >   the existing amenity=parking key, for "backwards compatibility".
> >     >   It should also distinguish single floor but underground parking.
> >     >   We perhaps should also have an indication of the total number of
> >     >   spaces at a location.  Any suggestion for key names for these?
> >
> >     amenity=parking
> >     type=open_air|multistory|underground
> >     capacity=N
> >
> >     or
> >
> >     amenity=parking
> >     parking=open_air|multistory|underground
> >     capacity=N
> >
> >
> > public=yes|true|no|false?
> > free=yes|true|no|false?
> > operator=text (e.g. NCP/Council/Sainsburys)?
> >
> As some people don't like underground parking or park garages, we should
> render them differently than open air parking areas - as already
> mentioned. Are all renderers able to distinguish rendering by these
> label combinations? At least mappaint can't do this, but once I got
> things going in mappaint development, I'll try to change this.
>
> BTW: parking=singlestory (only one area but "roofed" - anyone with a
> better name) is missing?


parking=covered ?

d
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20070713/7d9bfb98/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list