[OSM-talk] Potential problems moving/depreciating map features tags.

Ulf Lamping ulf.lamping at web.de
Sun Jul 15 03:49:11 BST 2007

Martijn van Oosterhout schrieb:
> On 7/13/07, Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping at web.de> wrote:
>> Example: osmarender misses a lot of icons for things already in the map
>> features.
> I think we should alter the proposal process for new features to state
> that details about rendering must be part of the proposal. So, for
> icons an example should be included, for roads a CSS snippet. These
> don't have to be done by the person proposing the feature, but it
> should have been submitted before the voting starts, so that people
> are also voting on how it would look like.
Sounds good!
> This would make it easier for renderers to include new features, since
> they don't then need to make them thmselves...
Even worse: Starting *another* long term voting process, this time for 
the corresponding icon :-(

Regards, ULFL

More information about the talk mailing list