[OSM-talk] Potential problems moving/depreciating map features tags.

Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog at gmail.com
Sun Jul 15 02:33:51 BST 2007

On 7/13/07, Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping at web.de> wrote:
> Example: osmarender misses a lot of icons for things already in the map
> features.

I think we should alter the proposal process for new features to state
that details about rendering must be part of the proposal. So, for
icons an example should be included, for roads a CSS snippet. These
don't have to be done by the person proposing the feature, but it
should have been submitted before the voting starts, so that people
are also voting on how it would look like.

This would make it easier for renderers to include new features, since
they don't then need to make them thmselves...

Have a nice day,
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog at gmail.com> http://svana.org/kleptog/

More information about the talk mailing list