[OSM-talk] RFC: geodesy=pillar
Andy_J_Robinson at blueyonder.co.uk
Mon Jul 16 20:06:29 BST 2007
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
>Sent: 16 July 2007 6:59 PM
>To: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] RFC: geodesy=pillar
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Anybody attending SotM should have heard Steve Chilton in "Map Room 101"
>me, talking about those big chunks of rock in the middle of nowhere that
>used by topographers as points of reference. For those who didn't attend
>SotM, have a looky at the photos here:
>Call them triangulation pillars, call them geodetic vertices, call them how
>you like. Fact is, I'm gonna upload a few thousand of them in a couple of
>So, I'm proposing the following tags to be applied on nodes:
>geodesy = pillar
>Depicts a geodetic (or geodesic) pillar
If they are pillars then thats fine. If a more general term is required how
about geodesy = station or survey_station
>geodesy:network = foobar
>Several pillars together form a geodetic network, which usually has a name.
This works but not sure a namespace is really required. Perhaps also
>geodesy:reference = 1234
>Pillars in the same network are identified by a reference number.
Same as above. Perhaps geogdetic_ref=
But anyway, it's not that critical to get it perfect. The tags can always be
mapped to other tags later (eg for a STAGS type approach). Whichever you or
I have suggested its obvious what's implied.
>So, any comments on this?
>Iván Sánchez Ortega <ivansanchez at escomposlinux.org>
>Un ordenador no es un televisor ni un microondas, es una herramienta
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the talk