[OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Implementing 'undo' in Potlatch
imi at eigenheimstrasse.de
Tue Jul 17 12:47:59 BST 2007
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
> Easily the most frequently requested Potlatch feature at SOTM was an
> 'undo' feature.
> Essentially, because Potlatch is an online editor, I'm going to
> implement this as a history rollback. In other words, undo will return
> to the previous version of a way. You can only undo your own work,
> i.e. you can't roll another person's edits back.
> So there are two ways to do it:
> a) Destructive rollback - Delete the most recent version from the
> database, and set the previous version (and any associated
> segments/nodes) as current/visible.
> b) Non-destructive rollback - Set the current version as invisible,
> then insert the previous version as a new version, thereby maintaining
> the "undone" version in the history.
> Given that you'll only be able to undo your own edits, I'm tempted to
> go for (a). But I would appreciate views from all and sundry,
> particularly keepers of the flame of database purity such as SteveC
> and TomH.
PRETTY PLEASE don't do a). This will much confuse conflict resolving
algorithms when they accidentally got a snapshot of the state before the
Just remember that for everything you added, there might be already an
replication of the data somewhere in JOSM-memory, on hard disk, in
replication servers, in planet.osms etc... and if you hard-delete your
data (in the best case) they will just think their state is more recent
and undo your undo.
DF0E A04F 7063 69C5 A76B 7557 0A77 608F 9172 3535
More information about the talk