[OSM-talk] Recording completeness
corey.burger at gmail.com
Sat Jul 21 00:50:55 BST 2007
On 7/17/07, Chris Morley <c.morley at dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> I think there are two aspects here, both important.
> Recording stubs is a way of reminding oneself (and others) of where
> there is more to do. I agree that it should be encouraged.
> A completeness boundary is is a message to users of the data. Nestoria
> use the Isle of Wight because it is complete. Some other parts of the
> country are just as complete but the boundaries of the completed area
> are less obvious. We need to make them explicit.
One key thing about this is that we don't impose such a burden on
recording completeness that nobody does it. One idea might be to have
each t12 tile tagged as complete or not.
More information about the talk