[OSM-talk] OSM as Map Publishers (was Re: TomTom acqures TeleAltas)
frederik at remote.org
Mon Jul 23 20:02:06 BST 2007
> I've been pondering for some time whether OSM should be hosting our own
> slippy maps or whether our role should be to *only* provide raw data.
> Leaving it to others to render and publish slippy maps etc.
Currently: We need to publish a map for people to see and use.
In the long run: We will be able to rely on sponsors hosting and
rendering general maps using our data, and *they* will have such a good
standing that people will use *them* as permalinks. If permalinks are
still en vogue by that time.
In the long run, we will concentrate much more on (a) showcasing (small,
static) cool examples people have made and (b) creating and serving
"debug" type of maps that contain information relevant to the process of
maintaining map data - e.g. areas coloured by recency of latest changes,
maps with bugs that have been reported, maps that community members can
use to tell other community members about the mapping process, and so
on. These will be highly sophisticated but low-traffic as they only
serve the mapping community.
I don't envisage OpenStreetMap as the long-term sole purveyor of free
map imagery. Let others create these maps. There will be ruptures of
course, as when someone decides to put ads on, and then it will take a
few months for someone else offering maps without ads, and so on, but in
the long run we should really really position ourselves as the producers
and guardians of the data, not what is made from it.
But again - that's a few years away probably. Until then, we do need to
produce and offer our own maps because we're not yet cool enough for
others to host our maps.
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00.09' E008°23.33'
More information about the talk