[OSM-talk] Rejected: Landuse=green_space
David Earl
david at frankieandshadow.com
Mon Jun 11 09:42:52 BST 2007
> -----Original Message-----
> From: talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org
> [mailto:talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org]On Behalf Of Alex Mauer
> Sent: 11 June 2007 05:59
> To: talk at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OSM-talk] Rejected: Landuse=green_space
>
>
> Voting ended for landuse=green_space 4 months ago. Results:
>
> 1 - Approve
> 2 - oppose
I think this is a shame. Again, 3 votes is pathetic and neither opposed the
principle, just the name of the tag!
This means some of us will continue to mark the island in the middle of a
group of houses inappropriately as a park. I have many dozens of such areas
in and around Cambridge, and the number is growing to an extent that it will
be hard to change manually before long.
I will reintroduce this proposal as 'landuse=grass' as that's what the
voters against wanted, even though it doesn't really describe the concept
properly: many such islands, corners, breathing spaces have trees and
shrubbery. If I'd noticed at the time I would have made that comments. But
the exact tag name really doesn't matter, it's just a word; people do get so
exercised by what the exact name of tags should be.
> I have moved this to rejected and removed it from proposed features.
(You don't seem to have moved it (or the others) to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Rejected_features)
David
More information about the talk
mailing list