[OSM-talk] RFC: Scout Camp

[Alex Mauer]

Adam Schreiber wrote:
> On 6/11/07, Russell Phillips <russ at phillipsuk.org> wrote:
>> A while ago, I created a proposal for an amenity=scout_camp tag. I
>> thought I'd mention it so that people can voice their opinions before I
>> or someone else actually opens voting.
> 
> I like having the idea of a camp tag, but feel that scout_camp may be
> too specific.  In the states there are many different types of camps
> which could include: church camps, boy scout camps, girl scout camps
> (yes they're different on this side of the pond), commercial camp
> grounds, etc.
> Would the tag amenity=camp with some variety of type= tag work?  

I agree, though I'd prefer amenity=camp_ground, for nodes and areas.

instead of type, would it be sufficient to use the name= and access=
tags? e.g. amenity=camp_ground, name=Church of the FSM, access=permissive.?

> In
> the case of church camps, an additional tag would be included with the
> sect/denomination involved similar to churches.

+1 to this.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20070611/ada49966/attachment.pgp>