[OSM-talk] Potlatch :-)
Sebastian Spaeth
Sebastian at SSpaeth.de
Thu Nov 29 12:17:35 GMT 2007
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> We do now have per-object rollbacks. It's just not live yet because
> I'm waiting for peer review of the code, as per previous messages
Richard, how hard would it be to set up a live potatch instance on the
dev server that talks to a local PostGIS installation?
This way we could provide a beta potlatch test which works on
semi-current data with no danger of damaging real data. We could load a
new dump each week/day or something.
spaetz
More information about the talk
mailing list