[OSM-talk] Potlatch :-)

Sebastian Spaeth Sebastian at SSpaeth.de
Thu Nov 29 12:17:35 GMT 2007


Richard Fairhurst wrote:

> We do now have per-object rollbacks. It's just not live yet because  
> I'm waiting for peer review of the code, as per previous messages

Richard, how hard would it be to set up a live potatch instance on the 
dev server that talks to a local PostGIS installation?

This way we could provide a beta potlatch test which works on 
semi-current data with no danger of damaging real data. We could load a 
new dump each week/day or something.

spaetz




More information about the talk mailing list