[OSM-talk] Potlatch :-)

[Richard Fairhurst]

Sebastian Spaeth wrote:

> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
>> We do now have per-object rollbacks. It's just not live yet because
>> I'm waiting for peer review of the code, as per previous messages
>
> Richard, how hard would it be to set up a live potatch instance on the
> dev server that talks to a local PostGIS installation?

I don't know anything about PostGIS, I'm afraid. It would be easy to  
set one up talking to a local MySQL installation but I suspect that  
amf_controller.rb might pretty much have to be rewritten in its  
entirety for PostGIS. But I'm not talking from a position of any  
knowledge here.

cheers
Richard

(follow-ups to dev?)