[OSM-talk] Car Sharing Sites, worthy of inclusion ?
Patrick Weber
p.weber at ucl.ac.uk
Tue Oct 9 11:59:56 BST 2007
Sven Grüner wrote:
> Frederik Ramm schrieb:
>
>>> I reckon amenity=car_share on a node marking the parking spot.
>>> Question -
>>> if you have three cars in adjacent parking spaces (as we have here at
>>> BedZED) do you mark it with three nodes, or an additional tag on a
>>> single
>>> node?
>>>
>> amenity=car_sharing
>> operator=somecompany
>> capacity=3
>>
>
> I'd also favor 'operator' instead of 'name'. This appears to be a really
> versatile tag, as shown in the post_box/operator-discussion.
>
> While we're discussing this would't it make sense to add 'bike_share' as
> well? Doing this now would be smart because these share a lot of attributes.
>
> MfG, Sven
>
>
Good point, this would follow very much the same scheme. I remember
those bike sharing stations from Brussels. Again, capacity would be useful!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: p.weber.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 282 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20071009/fcb05ef2/attachment.vcf>
More information about the talk
mailing list