[OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] TIGER, which states next?

[Karl Newman]

On 10/24/07, Karl Newman <siliconfiend at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/07, Karl Newman <siliconfiend at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/23/07, Dave Hansen <dave at sr71.net> wrote:
> > > I'm basically out of empty states to upload. I've done Oregon,
> > > Washington, Montana, North/South Dakota, Alabama and Georgia.  Should I
> > > just start uploading over existing data, or are there some large swaths
> > > of states out there that I can put in the queue?
> > >
> > > -- Dave
> >
> > The following Northwest California counties are pretty empty right now
> > (except for some major roads and coastlines):
> > Del Norte
> > Humboldt
> > Mendocino
> > Trinity
> > Lake
> >
> > There's a bunch of unwayed segments and unwayed nodes in there. I
> > might purge those out before you start the upload.
> >
> > I'm looking at Northeast CA right now to find more candidates.
> >
> Okay, someone has done a fair amount of mapping around Lassen NP, but
> I don't think the TIGER data will collide too much. So, I think you
> can safely add the following Northeast CA counties, too:
> Siskiyou
> Shasta
> Tehama
> Plumas
> Butte
> Glenn
> Colusa
> Yuba
> Sierra
> Nevada
>
> I'll keep looking for more candidates in CA. (I'm using data from the
> planet file and looking at the results in JOSM).
>
Add these, too:
Sutter
Yolo
Placer
El Dorado
Sacramento
Amador
Alpine
Calaveras
Tuolomne
San Joaquin
Stanislaus
Merced
Mariposa
Madera
Mono
Fresno
San Benito
Kings
Tulare
Inyo
Santa Cruz
Monterey
San Luis Obispo
Kern