[OSM-talk] Suggestion more complete mapping verifactiion

[Gregory Marler]

At the end of day 1 at the ShoHo mapping party I was wondering about the
bits that did not get complete.

For example in my designated cake slice, there was a small area with about 5
roads I didn't get a chance to go down (and see how they linked up and what
roads came off them). I wondered about leaving a note in the wiki of what
needed area in my cake had not been mapped at the party, would people read
that if they were going near there with a GPS or a notepad(for names)?

Is it worthwhile having an area k=dragons v=be_here ? Would people even make
such areas?

Gregory/LastGrape


On 15/09/2007, D Tucny <d at tucny.com> wrote:
>
> On 15/09/2007, John Baker <rovastar at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So if anyone could assist me with the "official" sources of data for
> > streets please let me know and I will see what I can work out.
> >
>
> Some good ideas there, not sure what the licence you can buy for the PAF
> allows you to do with it, but, worth investigating, for the UK only though,
> not necessarily of use anywhere else...
>
> B) Mailing lists? It is 2007 not 1997 people.
> > Where is the other one I thought they came in pairs. I thought
> > everything on the ark came in pairs……..
> >
>
> But I'm totally confused by this... erm... what are you trying to say?
>
> d
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>


-- 
Gregory
nomoregrapes at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20070915/21435418/attachment.html>