[OSM-talk] Highways with highway=steps

[Peter Miller]

> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:56:49 +0200
> From: bob+osm at cakebox.net (Knut Arne Bj?rndal )
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Highways with highway=steps
> To: talk at openstreetmap.org
> Message-ID: <87sl4zngu6.fsf at pastry.cakebox.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> "Peter Miller" <peter.miller at itoworld.com> writes:
> 
> > Can you also get maplint to accept:-
> 
> I suspect you are talking about the not-in-map_features test, which is
> (mostly) automatically created from map features, so anything there should
> be accepted after a developer runs the updating script.
> 
> > ncn=yes
> 
> I found route=ncn in map features, I suspect that does what you want.
> 

As mentioned elsewhere, route=ncn is deprecated and ncn='xxx' rcn='xxx' and
lcn='xxx' are recommended in practice (even if no vote has taken place yet)

> > amenity=bicycle_parking
> 
> Hm, this should be accepted. Could you point me at an area where maplint
> complains about this?
> 

Ok, so it was actually the suggested supplementary tag 'capacity=6' that was
causing the problem. Not voted on but I think this is being used for various
purposes to indicate capacity, for example on car parks. I am relaxed if you
don't filter it for now.

> > highway=secondary ?with? roundabout=true ; the combination seems to fail
> 
> As already noted by Tom, it's junction=roundabout.
> 

Thanks. Noted. Not sure where that idea came into my head!

> > cycleway=track / lane / opposite_track / opposite_lane  ; I think some
> of
> > these tags are already accepted, but not all
> 
> If you could point me to an example I could have a look at it.
> 

Umm. So I think I must have had some old maplint rendering from before it
was included. Now I look at it again it is clear (I requested a re-rendered
this morning and it is now sorted)



Thanks, and sorry of bothering people.



Peter


> --
> Knut Arne Bj?rndal
> aka Bob K?re
> bob at cakebox.net
> http://bob.cakebox.net/