[OSM-talk] Lakes and relations, what did I break?
Martijn van Oosterhout
kleptog at gmail.com
Mon Apr 21 08:05:21 BST 2008
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> Close-areas uses a tile index to find out what to do when it
> encounters a tile with *no* coastline at all (and your tiles do not
> have coastline on them). The tile index may indicate either land, sea,
> or "mixed". It returns "mixed" for your tiles. I am leaning towards
> changing this into "land" because your tiles are, from a "the coast of
> Ireland" perspective, clearly inland... any thoughts on that, Martijn
> (who invented the tile index)?
Yeah, it should be marked land. I find it interesting that bugs in the
tile index have become quite rare recently, which would indicate
we've almost converged to almost the right file.
> My initial implementation of close-areas did create a blue background
> only if the tile index indicated "sea". It seems that meanwhile
> someone has added code to "guess" the background colour in cases where
> the tile index indicates "mixed". The guessing goes like this:
Yeah, the guessing rule was a bit if a hack, and IIRC you're looking
at the new version :)
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog at gmail.com> http://svana.org/kleptog/
More information about the talk
mailing list