[OSM-talk] Fwd: Rendering wish value "suburb"
Artem Pavlenko
artem.mapnik at googlemail.com
Tue Feb 5 14:23:25 GMT 2008
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Michael Galonska <mgalons at gmx.de>
> Date: 31 January 2008 19:27:14 GMT
> To: Artem Pavlenko <artem.mapnik at googlemail.com>
> Subject: Rendering wish value "suburb"
>
> Hello Artem,
>
> Would it be possible to show the key=place value="suburbs" on
> Mapnik with the same rules as
> k=place, v=village? In Germany, some suburbs belong to a city or town,
> but look from the outside like another village, e.g. they are
> situated outside of the city body at
> 1 km distance. On the map the name of the neighboring village is
> shown, while the suburbs name
> does not appear. The difference is mainly administrative only.
> It appears Mapnik does not render the value suburb. I do not know
> who administrates the OSM-Mapnik.
> If you do not administrate the OSM-Mapnik-Tiles, perhaps you could
> forward it to the person who does (steve8?).
>
> An example are Dutenhofen, Allendorf and Münchholzhausen
> immediately southeast of Gießen, Germany, which are suburbs. Their
> names do not appear in Mapnik. On the other hand places like
> Heuchelheim (west of Gießen) are tagged as villages, and they do
> appear.
> The value suburb is also rendered on the corresponding Osmarender map.
>
> The example link:
> http://www.informationfreeway.org/?
> lat=50.562568187435595&lon=8.600855394950692&zoom=13&layers=0000F0B0F
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Michael Galonska
> Longbow4u on
> OSM
Sounds reasonable to me. Can we render place=suburbs ?
Artem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080205/1f11a753/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list