[OSM-talk] place=country/nation/state
Martin Trautmann
traut at gmx.de
Mon Feb 18 20:48:05 GMT 2008
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> I really like the NUTS system, as it is politically neutral, and balanced
> between different countries. IMHO, OSM should have a similar classification
> system.
NUTS is ok for certain statistical classification - but it may add on
one hand levels just by population which will cause splits which are not
known within the country itself. On the other hand the split of NUTS may
follow the same structures which are given within the country - but they
will add abbreviations which are still not known within the country.
This does conflict with existing levels within the country. Take e.g.
Germany and Austria. They use hierarchical number systems, such as
01 Schleswig-Holstein (a federal state in Germany, two digits, 16 states)
01001 Flensburg (a district / Landkreis, here the northmost in Germany,
five digits)
01001000 Flensburg (the community / Gemeinde - here the same as the town)
The German system is called "Amtlicher Gemeindeschlüssel", the Austrian
is "Gemeindeschlüssel". Switzerland and Belgium use different,
hierarchical level number systems and levels.
> The downside of NUTS is that it is only well-defined for the EU. For the rest
> of the world countries, a parallel classification would be needed.
>
> Anybody care to draft something for a feature proposal?
There are both for language and country the proper ISO standards. For
levels below I suppose that you have to adopt each national system.
That's why the [[OpenGeoDB]] has three approaches here:
first: a basic static classification system by levels which may be
filled more or less completely:
DE AT CH
country en:Germany en:Austria en:Switzerland
de:Deutschland de:Österreich de:Schweiz
state Bundesland Bundesland Kanton
gov. region Regierungsbezirk - -
district Landkreis Bezirk Bezirk
offices Amt
municipality Gemeinde Gemeinde Gemeinde
...
second: the (optional) type name, such as "Amt",
"Verwaltungsgemeinschaft", "Stadt", ...
third: a "part of" relation, what is part of what
- Martin
More information about the talk
mailing list