[OSM-talk] Fire break advice
David Janda
dj at dotcomdave.com
Thu Jul 17 06:19:01 BST 2008
Hello Talk
I see where you are comming from Karl, and it's a good solution.
However, I do feel that a landuse tag would be better, as in my case here in
Cyprus we have fire breaks that are NOT in a wood or forrest. We have a very
combustable grass about half a meter in height along the mountains that has
fire breaks.
Also, as a previous post has mentioned, fire breaks are good navigation
aids, and just having them as a track would not make them stand out. As in
my case here the vast majority of fire breaks run along a track anyway.
Am busy making ravel arrangements to return to the UK, but next week I will
make a proposal unless someone has a major objection.
David Janda
djanda
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karl Eichwalder" <ke at gnu.franken.de>
To: "David Janda" <dj at dotcomdave.com>
Cc: <talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org>; <talk at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 6:27 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Fire break advice
> "David Janda" <dj at dotcomdave.com> writes:
>
>> And, as a previous post has pointed out, they can be very wide. So, just
>> marking them as a path or whatever will not do I think.
>>
>> A landuse issue?
>
> I'd say the fire breaks are part of landuse=forest, but are not covered
> by natural=wood:
>
> +- fire break
> |
> //================\===/=====================\\ <-
> || | | || |
> || | | || |
> || wood | | wood || forest
> || | | || |
> || | | || |
> \\================/===\=====================// <-
>
> ^ ^
> |------------- landuse=forest ---------------|
>
> That's there is a large forest area holding two wood areas separated by
> a fire break. The woods are "on top" of the forest and the fire break
> is just an empty space in the forest. There is no need to tag is
> specially, just put a track (with tracktype=gradeX) in if there is any.
>
> --
> Karl Eichwalder
>
More information about the talk
mailing list