[OSM-talk] Using highway links
shaun at shaunmcdonald.me.uk
Sun Jul 20 14:03:53 BST 2008
On 20 Jul 2008, at 13:40, Hooman Mesgary wrote:
> so for primary to secondary link should I use primary_link?
> should we/you/them change and fix the definition of motorway_link,
> trunk_link and primary_link?
You can update the page to reduce confusion.
> p.s: why u didn't replied on the list?
Accidentally hit reply instead of reply all.
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Shaun McDonald <shaun at shaunmcdonald.me.uk
> > wrote:
> Use the highest classification.
> Trunk -> primary/secondary = trunk_link
> Motorway -> trunk/primary/secondary = motorway_link
> On 20 Jul 2008, at 11:36, Hooman Mesgary wrote:
>> I want to know what should I use for linking a trunk to primary?
>> "highway=trunk_link" or "highway=primary_link"? what about linking
>> any secondary to a trunk (yes there is)? because in the definition
>> for highway=trunk_link said "The link roads (sliproads / ramps)
>> leading to and from a trunk road" and in the defenition for
>> highway=primary_link said "The link roads (sliproads / ramps)
>> leading to and from a primary road"
>> There is the same question for linking a primary to secondary.
>> ps: also I wrote this on talk page of highway. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Talk:Key:highway#links
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk