[OSM-talk] Using highway links

[Shaun McDonald]

On 20 Jul 2008, at 13:40, Hooman Mesgary wrote:

> Hi,
> so for primary to secondary link should I use primary_link?

yes

> should we/you/them change and fix the definition of motorway_link,  
> trunk_link and primary_link?

You can update the page to reduce confusion.

>
> Regards,
> -Hooman
>
> p.s: why u didn't replied on the list?
>

Accidentally hit reply instead of reply all.

>
>
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Shaun McDonald <shaun at shaunmcdonald.me.uk 
> > wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Use the highest classification.
>
> Trunk -> primary/secondary = trunk_link
> Motorway -> trunk/primary/secondary = motorway_link
>
> Shaun
> On 20 Jul 2008, at 11:36, Hooman Mesgary wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I want to know what should I use for linking a trunk to primary?  
>> "highway=trunk_link" or "highway=primary_link"? what about linking  
>> any secondary to a trunk (yes there is)? because in the definition  
>> for highway=trunk_link said "The link roads (sliproads / ramps)  
>> leading to and from a trunk road" and in the defenition for  
>> highway=primary_link said "The link roads (sliproads / ramps)  
>> leading to and from a primary road"
>> There is the same question for linking a primary to secondary.
>> Regards,
>> -Hooman
>>
>> ps: also I wrote this on talk page of highway. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Talk:Key:highway#links
>>
>> -- 
>> http://mesgary.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> http://mesgary.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080720/3f645f2b/attachment.html>