[OSM-talk] Rendering of tracktype

[Karl Newman]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Alex S. <maps at swavely.com> wrote:

> Andy Allan wrote:
> > Meh. It's on my list of things to do, but to be honest I don't see it
> > as very important. There's lots of things that the cycle map doesn't
> > render at all, and for one I see distinguishing onroad/offroad cycle
> > routes as more important than the difference between tracktypes; ditto
> > for distinguishing bicycle=yes/no on footpaths and so on.
>
> I ride a bicycle with 'slicks' (tires with no tread) and like to avoid
> tracks which are not paved.  Having a map with a nice visual indicator
> of track type would be a boon.
>

Umm... According to Map_Features, tracks are ALWAYS unpaved:
"unpaved/unsealed roads for agricultural use; gravel roads in the forest
etc." There, your problem's solved--just avoid all tracks.

Karl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080612/0bd2a62a/attachment.html>