[OSM-talk] How to correct logical errors in some effective way?

[David Earl]

On 01/03/2008 12:12, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> There are lots of pure typos which could be most effectively corrected directly in the database without using JOSM or something in between.  Is there somebody whom I could send a list of the items that need update?  I can get osm_id of those features, I suppose it is unique and usable for batch updates.
...
> secondary
> secondary_link
> service
> steps

Those are widely recognized tags AFAICS.

> ski_jump
> snowmobileway

While unconventional (particularly the first), there's no reason why 
someone shouldn't tag these things like this.

We should only be correcting obviously unintended typos, not 
unconventional tagging.

David