[OSM-talk] How to correct logical errors in some effective way?

[Rahkonen Jukka]

David Earl wrote:

>> secondary
>> secondary_link
>> service
>> steps

>Those are widely recognized tags AFAICS.

>> ski_jump
>> snowmobileway

>While unconventional (particularly the first), there's no reason why 
>someone shouldn't tag these things like this.

>We should only be correcting obviously unintended typos, not 
>unconventional tagging.

I am sorry about being unclear.  My list was an unfiltered excerpt from
SQL query "select distinct highway from osm_line order by highway".
I did not mean that all those tags are typos.

-Jukka-