[OSM-talk] Cycle lanes

[Cartinus]

On Monday 24 March 2008 09:53:07 Andy Allan wrote:
> If the way is tagged with highway=cycleway I don't think it needs
> cycleway=track, btw.

+1

> I'm going to put together a guide for how to tag cycle paths, since
> I've been contacted by a few other groups who are finding our tagging
> insufficient for their needs (such as shared use vs segregated paths),
> and I hope that'll clear things up a bit.

Great

> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Mike Collinson <mike at ayeltd.biz> wrote:
> >  As a cyclist currently in Stockholm, I personally draw a separate way
> > and label it highway=cycleway, cycleway=track, foot=yes, surface=paved.

I think the surface=paved is redundant too, because that is what I would 
expect if no surface tag was put on the way.


-- 
just my 2c,
Cartinus