[OSM-talk] Cycle lanes
Karl Eichwalder
ke at gnu.franken.de
Mon Mar 24 15:31:04 GMT 2008
>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Mike Collinson <mike at ayeltd.biz> wrote:
>> > As a cyclist currently in Stockholm, I personally draw a separate way
>> > and label it highway=cycleway, cycleway=track, foot=yes,
>> surface=paved.
>
> I think the surface=paved is redundant too, because that is what I would
> expect if no surface tag was put on the way.
Because I do not the surface if I cannot remember me (surface=uncertain?),
a little bit redundancy does not hurt. This I know for sure, what's the
matter, esp. because in Germany many cycleways are unpaved...
More information about the talk
mailing list